|
news
Apr 03, 2010Now or never: get rid of nuclear weapons.
Apr 02, 2010European Days of Action against nuclear weapons
Feb 10, 2010US Missile Interceptors Planned for Romania by 2015
Feb 05, 2010Romania accepts US 'invitation' to host anti-missile shield
Feb 02, 201050 activists enter "Dal Molin" base and chain them selves to the cranes
Feb 02, 2010Blenheim Sun reports on "courageous" protests at Waihopai spy base
Jan 27, 2010Mapping the troop deployment to Afghanistan
Jan 07, 2010Yemen to let US setup air base on its soil
Jan 07, 2010The question no US official dare ask
Jan 06, 2010 Waihopai Spybase Protest, January 22-24
Jan 06, 2010An alliance larger than one issue
Jan 05, 2010U.S. deploys fleet of interceptor missile ships to Mediterranean
Dec 09, 2009Initiative Concerning Pelindaba Treaty for African Nuclear Weapons Free Zone
Nov 14, 2009US health agency to take 'fresh look' at Vieques
Nov 14, 2009Obama lays out America’s Asia-Pacific agenda
Nov 13, 2009Pentagon urged to keep Guam better informed on Marine transfer
Nov 07, 2009US 8th Army headquarters may stay in Korea
Nov 07, 2009 USA to launch ICBM Minutman III on Nov 18 from Vandenberg Air Force Base to the Marshall Islands
Nov 05, 2009US may locate NATO missile command in Czech Republic
Nov 05, 2009US granted access to ALL Colombian airports!!
Jun 29, 2009On Okinawa, US move may lead to nixing of Futenma relocation plan
WASHINGTON - A key U.S. congressional committee has added an amendment to the fiscal 2010 defense budget that would make it hard to realize an agreement reached by the Japanese and U.S. governments over the relocation of the U.S. Marine Corps' Futenma Air Station in Ginowan, Okinawa Prefecture. Japan and the United States have already agreed the facility will be relocated to the shoreline off Camp Schwab in Nago, in the prefecture. By Satoshi Ogawa, for Yomiuri Shimbun The amendment says the U.S. defense secretary should not give its approval to the alternative facility as long as it fails to comply with minimum flight safety requirements. The office of Rep. Neil Abercrombie, D-Hawaii, who proposed the amendment, told The Yomiuri Shimbun that the alternative facility under the current plan contravenes safety standards on the following points: As a result, Abercrombie has stated that Camp Schwab is not an appropriate candidate for the alternative facility and that a new transfer location should be sought. A Japanese government source said, "The content of this amendment suggests the transfer to the alternative facility agreed by Japan and the United States won't be permitted." The defense budget, including the amendment, was adopted by the U.S. House of Representatives Armed Services Committee on June 16. Discussion of the budget at the Senate Armed Services Committee was due to start Tuesday. After joint committee discussions, the budget will be voted on in both chambers. According to sources close to the matter, the Defense Department will try to persuade Congress to remove the amendment from the final defense budget. If Congress passes the budget intact, the focus will shift to whether President Barack Obama decides to veto it. comments add comment
If you have an account please login before adding a comment. login
Fred Jakobcic wrote on Jul 01, 2009:
Get rid of these bases...they are an anachronism and a sign of fear and bad foreign policy that our government and others think is necessitated by such policies based on conditions and times that really are also an anacrhonism...an era past that we perpetutate to perpetuate bases based on an anachronistic era.
|
|
CopyRight© 2009 No Bases. This site is an initiative from No Bases and was developped by EasyMind.
|